Addiction Recovery

Substance Use Treatment in Diverse Settings

Integrating behavioral health and primary care services presents certain workforce challenges. The scarcity of healthcare professionals who are trained in both primary care and addiction treatment is a significant barrier.

Valor Lakes

April 8, 2024

The integration of recovery support services with primary care is an integral aspect of the treatment of Substance Use Disorders (SUDs). This two-way integration acknowledges the intertwined nature of physical and behavioral health, particularly for individuals battling SUDs. Clients with SUDs often have an increased risk of various physical health problems.

These can range from liver diseases due to alcohol abuse to heart issues associated with stimulant use. This heightened risk necessitates ongoing primary care to monitor and manage these health concerns. Regular engagement with primary care providers can be key to a client’s overall health and recovery. It’s not just about treating the addiction but also addressing the accompanying physical health challenges.

However, integrating behavioral health and primary care services presents certain workforce challenges. The scarcity of healthcare professionals who are trained in both primary care and addiction treatment is a significant barrier. Despite this, the benefits of integration are too substantial to ignore, necessitating innovative solutions. By providing medical care at substance use treatment facilities or recovery community centers, we ensure that clients have easy access to comprehensive care. This setup not only addresses their addiction recovery needs but also their broader health concerns, creating a more well-rounded treatment experience. By having addiction specialists and recovery support staff in primary care settings, we bring the expertise in substance abuse closer to the general patient population. It enables an environment where primary care seamlessly overlaps with specialized addiction support.

At Valor Lakes, we are mindful of actively ensuring that clients in substance use treatment programs have access to and maintain contact with primary care providers.

This link ensures continuity of care, with both the substance use and physical health aspects being managed concurrently. Equipping primary care providers with the skills to screen for problematic substance use, conduct brief interventions, and make referrals for further assessment is essential. Such training enhances the primary care provider’s ability to identify and address substance use issues early, potentially preventing more severe complications.

The integration of recovery support services with primary care is not just an additive process but a transformative approach to treating SUDs. It’s about creating a more comprehensive and accessible system of care that recognizes and addresses the multifaceted nature of addiction. Valor Lakes, in its commitment to empowering veterans towards lasting recovery, champions such integrated approaches. We see the value in not just treating the addiction but nurturing overall well-being, a philosophy that is central to our personalized IOP treatment and trauma-focused therapy. By adopting these integrative strategies, we move closer to our goal of facilitating courageous transformation and achieving sustainable recovery outcomes for our clients.

When an organization cannot offer comprehensive substance use treatment and recovery support services on-site, developing formal linkages with other providers is crucial to ensure continuity and completeness of care. By collaborating with other substance use treatment and recovery organizations within the community, organizations can create a support network, leading to increased access to client services and more opportunities for staff training while reducing the duplication of services across the Recovery-Oriented Systems of Care (ROSC). It's imperative that these collaborations are formed with organizations that share a similar vision and recovery-supportive environment to avoid potential difficulties for clients. 

There are additional strategies that enhance an organization’s collaboration readiness. These include identifying sister agencies and referral sources through one's funding sources, pinpointing specific individuals in other programs for collaboration, especially for clients with complex needs, and establishing formal mechanisms for collaboration, such as developing interagency coordinating committees and creating memoranda of understanding to define each provider's roles clearly. Further, it involves having staff members from different organizations work together in joint service planning and identifying common training needs to address client requirements efficiently.

Cross-training staff is essential to mutual understanding of each other’s services and cultures. Additionally, forming a consortium of programs that sponsor annual training programs, co-locating services from multiple providers, developing blended funding initiatives, ensuring realistic workloads, establishing mechanisms to mediate disagreements, monitoring service provision, and motivating stakeholder interest are all part of the bundle strategies that lead to client success. These measures facilitate a collaborative environment and provide the effective implementation of services, ultimately benefiting the clients in their recovery journey. Valor Lakes echoes these strategies in its commitment to providing holistic and personalized care, ensuring that even when services are unavailable on-site, the veterans are still supported through a well-coordinated care network.

Developing partnerships with local recovery communities and community-based peer support services is a vital strategy for substance use treatment programs. Such collaborations improve the program's treatment capacity, offer mechanisms to help clients maintain recovery gains post-treatment, reduce the recurrence of substance use, and promote ongoing recovery. A necessary part of this strategy involves identifying community resources and actively engaging in linkage strategies. Clients in recovery often have diverse goals that extend beyond traditional treatment modalities. For instance, a client might aim to improve literacy, and financial planning skills, learn a musical instrument, or acquire better parenting skills. To support these varied goals, treatment programs must be aware of the community resources available, many offered at low or no cost by governmental, nongovernmental organizations, or local businesses. This could include adult literacy services, financial planning assistance, music lessons, or parenting classes. Local businesses, charities, and even colleges or universities often provide such services, which can be instrumental in a client’s holistic recovery process.

Forming these partnerships isn’t always straightforward. Some organizations or businesses might initially be hesitant to collaborate with those in recovery from substance use. Treatment programs can play a role in bridging this gap by hosting events to educate and promote understanding or by facilitating outreach where program staff and graduates introduce themselves to potential partner organizations. Effective strategies to identify recovery resources in the community include designating a staff member, preferably someone with a background in peer recovery support, to identify and track these resources.

This involves creating and maintaining a comprehensive list of recovery supports such as self-help groups, vocational training programs, social services, clubhouses, and sober houses. Additionally, maintaining an updated log of online resources and posting these resources on the program's website can be beneficial. Programs can also benefit from the input of current clients and alumni who can share valuable information about supportive resources and organizations. Regularly searching for new resources and services is also crucial. This can include connecting with state or local health or mental health departments, client organizations like the National Alliance on Mental Illness, and recovery-oriented media sites. By adopting these strategies, treatment programs can significantly extend the scope and effectiveness of their services, ensuring clients have access to a wide array of resources that support their journey toward lasting recovery. 

To actively engage in a Recovery-Oriented System of Care (ROSC), an organization needs to go beyond just being aware of other recovery-oriented services and community resources. It's about actively forming linkages and partnerships with other ROSC organizations when appropriate. Program leaders should understand that community-based recovery support services are not merely extensions of their counseling program but can serve as alternatives or adjuncts to formal treatment. Conversely, the program’s counseling services may also complement the offerings of community-based services. Recovery Community Organizations (RCOs) have their own traditions, bylaws, ethical codes, standards of care, and guidelines governing their relationships with outside organizations. It is crucial for any partnering organization to respect and become familiar with these governing factors. RCOs may support various pathways and styles of recovery that differ from those recommended by the organization and its counselors. Respecting all types of recovery is essential, as each journey is unique and valid.

Maintaining linkages is an ongoing, time-consuming process that requires mutual trust, but the benefits become evident as organizational bonds with community resources strengthen. For programs initiating the linkage process, starting with a single project for an "easy win" can be effective. This initial collaboration provides an opportunity to identify further partnership opportunities, leading to increased coordination and sharing of work. Building strong relationships with organizations in the community that provide essential services not offered by the program is vital. Strategies for actively partnering with community recovery resources include:

1. Designating a staff person as a liaison with recovery-focused services and supports and developing relationships with key staff in other organizations. Specific staff members might be assigned as liaisons for particular communities based on their experience, membership, or familiarity with a certain culture or language.

2. Inviting representatives from the recovery community to join the program’s administrative staff in working groups to evaluate, revise, or select services and develop policies for linking to community resources.

3. Communicating with peer-based recovery support organizations about the program’s standards and expectations, such as not interfering with clients' medical treatment.

4. Offering facilities for recovery support meetings or services, like using an office for meetings with a recovery coach.

5. Developing a recovering alumni society to support clients transitioning out of the program.

6. Inviting individuals from various recovery organizations to present their groups to program clients and staff.

7. Supporting the development of volunteer peer groups to aid recovery activities at the program facility.

8. Helping organize support groups to meet unmet needs, such as forming a secular support group or one tailored to a specific population.

These strategies, aligning with Valor Lakes' ethos, emphasize the importance of comprehensive, community-involved, and respect-based approaches to recovery. By actively engaging in these partnerships, organizations enhance the range and effectiveness of their services, supporting clients in their unique paths toward lasting recovery. Extending these services beyond traditional treatment settings, particularly in correctional facilities, is vital in recovery-oriented counseling. 

Jails and prisons have a significantly higher proportion of individuals with problematic substance use compared to the general population. Embedding counseling programs within these facilities ensures that incarcerated individuals receive necessary substance use treatment and recovery support services, both during incarceration and, crucially, upon reentry into the community. Upon release, individuals often face overwhelming challenges in navigating available resources, increasing their risk of substance use recurrence and reentry into the criminal justice system. Heaps and colleagues highlight the essential functions of programs in these settings, which include coordinating services throughout the recovery process, offering ancillary services like vocational counseling and housing assistance, and empowering clients for phased integration into work, education, and family life.

Recovery programs in criminal justice settings must also be attuned to the needs of various subpopulations, which may have additional challenges requiring specific attention. Drug courts have emerged as effective institutions in linking recovery resources with criminal justice populations, offering structured, recovery-oriented practices for those involved in the justice system.

In implementing recovery-oriented counseling programs, there is also a need to develop or revise policies and procedures to align with recovery-focused goals. This includes a broad range of considerations, from client orientation and substance use policies to staff recruitment, training, and supervision, as well as recovery planning, recordkeeping, and discharge planning. Addressing employees with Substance Use Disorders (SUDs) and implementing drug testing are also critical aspects. A key aspect in designing programs that employ individuals in recovery is developing policies on employee SUDs and drug testing that are equitable and apply to all employees, irrespective of their recovery status. Drug-free workplace policies are recommended, focusing on prohibiting alcohol and drug use in the workplace and encouraging employees to seek help for drug problems voluntarily. These policies should be grounded in the health and safety of clients and the public, the maintenance of the program's quality and integrity, facility protection, and compliance with laws and regulations.

Further considerations include adhering to laws governing illicit substance use, professional ethical codes, and state licensing requirements that address counselor impairment. Additionally, the possibility of conducting random drug testing and requiring extra supervision for staff whose performance is impaired are important factors. It's essential to maintain consistency in policy while possibly implementing more stringent policies for counseling staff due to their high level of client interaction and the potential impact of their behavior on clients. Implementing these strategies within correctional facilities and developing recovery-oriented policies underscores the holistic and inclusive approach of recovery-oriented systems, such as those embraced by Valor Lakes.

Such approaches recognize the complexity of recovery, particularly for those transitioning from correctional settings, and the necessity of structured, empathetic, and comprehensive support for all individuals on their path to recovery.

Assessing the progress of a counseling program in terms of recovery-oriented organizational change necessitates identifying specific performance measures. These measures are not just indicators of the program's current effectiveness but also its ability to adapt and sustain changes. Key areas to measure include infrastructure stability, research personnel capabilities (if applicable), adaptive capacity, process measures of recovery-focused services, and, crucially, clients' long-term recovery, which involves monitoring their continuation and completion of the program. Programs may benefit from creating a dashboard of key performance measures to streamline this assessment process. This dashboard should be guided by timely data, ensuring the information used to evaluate progress is current and relevant. Additionally, monitoring treatment outcomes for substance use and co-occurring mental or physical conditions is vital.

The program’s effectiveness in promoting recovery is also reflected in outcome data, which many programs collect under the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) and the National Outcome Measures. However, it's important to note that not all programs use these measures, with some relying on different funding sources like Health Resources and Services Administration funds, which do not employ GPRA.

Regardless of the specific metrics used, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's (SAMHSA) National Framework for Quality Improvement in Behavioral Health Care offers a comprehensive set of quality measures that can guide programs in evaluating their services and making informed funding decisions. This framework includes goals pertinent to a recovery orientation, such as promoting person-centered care.

As organizations transition to a recovery orientation, leaders must consider strategies for revising and developing new policies and procedures, explore funding opportunities for greater flexibility in providing integrated services, and adjust workforce development processes to align with this orientation. By focusing on these areas, programs can enhance their capacity to support recovery effectively, aligning with the comprehensive and adaptive approach to recovery embraced by organizations like Valor Lakes. This alignment ensures services meet immediate treatment needs and foster long-term recovery and well-being.

Recent Articles

More from this Author